Harmonization of conflicting medical opinions using argumentation protocols and textual entailment - a case study on Parkinson disease

If all scientific publications that you have read were ranked according to their scientific quality and importance from 0% (worst) to 100% (best), where would you place this publication? Please rate by selecting a range.

This publication ranks between 9998979695949392919089888786858483828180797877767574737271706968676665646362616059585756555453525150494847464544434241403938373635343332313029282726252423222120191817161514131211109876543210% and 100999897969594939291908988878685848382818079787776757473727170696867666564636261605958575655545352515049484746454443424140393837363534333231302928272625242322212019181716151413121110987654321% of publications that I have read in terms of scientific quality and importance.

Review title (optional)

Review (optional)

Keep my rating and review anonymous
Show publicly that I gave the rating and I wrote the review

Save